Public Management
somayeh hassani; seyed ali akbar Ahmadi; Bahram Sarmast; hassan alvedari
Abstract
In today's turbulent world, organizations are struggling to gain competitive advantage. Staff silence has led to stagnation and inactivity in their physical and social networks, pushing the organization to the brink of collapse. The purpose of this study was to design a comprehensive organizational silence ...
Read More
In today's turbulent world, organizations are struggling to gain competitive advantage. Staff silence has led to stagnation and inactivity in their physical and social networks, pushing the organization to the brink of collapse. The purpose of this study was to design a comprehensive organizational silence model based on the organization's five pillars. The study method is descriptive and qualitative which has been implemented in two stages of Delphi and Library. In the first stage, components of organizational silence were identified by research literature. Then based on the five pillars of the organization (Environment, Persons, Structure, goals ,Technology), the proposed conceptual framework of organizational silence is achieved.statistical population includes university Professors of Payame Noor, Allameh Tabataba'i, Tehran, Beheshti and experimental managers in Tehran, using snowball sampling method.From all questions in all Delphi periods, the sample t-test and the mean and standard deviation were used. Kendall's correlation coefficient for all dimensions was calculated.The results showed that all the terms in all Delphi periods are meaningful and the factors related to the goals have the highest agreement, after which the technological factors, the inner environment, individual managers, structural, external environment and individual factors of employees. At the end of the final model, organizational silence was designed based on the five organizational roles. Therefore, it can be concluded that all five aspects of the organization and its dimensions can be effective in maintaining organizational silence and it is necessary that managers pay enough attention to organizational dynamics in all five dimensions of the organization.
General Management
Sayyed Mostafa Javadi; Hasan Alvedari; Amir Hosein Amirkhani; Ali Jamshidi
Volume 5, شماره 4 (پیاپی 20) , November 2017, , Pages 39-48
Abstract
Background & Objectives: Organizations, especially in the public sector, are usually static and uniform until the continuation of this situation is no longer feasible or altered by external forces. This is rooted in organizational lack of movement, or in other words organizational inertia. The purpose ...
Read More
Background & Objectives: Organizations, especially in the public sector, are usually static and uniform until the continuation of this situation is no longer feasible or altered by external forces. This is rooted in organizational lack of movement, or in other words organizational inertia. The purpose of this study is to provide a suitable model for correct encounter with organizational inertia in North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. Methods: The statistical population consisted of all personnel of the relevant organization. Using the Cochran formula, 170 people were selected by simple random sampling. The toolkit included library studies and questionnaires. Using descriptive and inferential statistics methods in AMOS and SPSS software, the validity and reliability of the research tool, regression analysis and structural equations were performed. Results: The average score of all factors was above 3, which is the highest amount related to knowledge management and the least amount related to psychological factors. After verifying the validity and reliability of the research tool, the results of the Structural Equation Model Questionnaire were obtained and, by analyzing it, the final model of the research was obtained. Conclusion: Organizational Inertia Management Model has four factors for knowledge management, change-setting activities, change management and psychological considerations in which knowledge management and psychological considerations improve the underlying changes in change management and change management. The underlying changes are also affecting change management.
